Skip to main content

Derive e

Prove that \( \left( 1 + \frac{1}{n} \right)^n \) converges.

Solution

Let \( G(n) =  \left( 1 + \frac{1}{n} \right)^n \).

Binomial expansion, \( G(n) = \sum_{k = 0}^{n} \frac{ \binom{n}{k} }{n^k} \).

By simple inequality argument, \( \frac{ \binom{n}{k} }{n^k} < \frac{1}{k!} \).

So if we let \( F(n) = \sum_{k = 0}^{n} \frac{1}{k!} \), we have \( G(n) < F(n) \).

By simple inequality argument, \( F(n) < 1 + \sum_{k = 1}^{n} \frac{1}{2^{k-1}} < 3 \).

So G and F are bounded above.

By AM-GM, \( \frac{G(n-1)}{G(n)} = \left( \frac{ n^2 }{ n^2 - 1} \right)^{(n-1)} \frac{ n}{n+1} < \left(  \frac{ \frac{ n^2 }{ n^2 - 1} (n-1) + \frac{ n}{n+1} }{n} \right)^n = 1 \). So \( G(n-1) < G(n) \).

Since G is monotonic increasing and bounded above, G converges.

Similarly F converges.

Let's also prove that G and F converges to the same limit.

By studying individual terms in \( F(n) - G(n) \) and making simple inequality arguments, we can show that for each \( \epsilon > 0 \) we can pick N s.t. \( F(n) - G(n) < \epsilon \) for all n > N. This can be further used to make the formal argument that the limit of F is the same as the limit of G.

So if we call the limit e, then \( \lim_{n \to \infty } \left( 1 + \frac{1}{n} \right) ^n  = 1 + \frac{1}{1!} + \frac{1}{2!} +  \frac{1}{3!} + \cdots = e \).

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

641 | 2^32 + 1

Problem: Show that \( 641 | 2^{32} + 1 \). Solution: (From Problem Solving Strategies, Arthur Engel) \( 641 = 625 + 16 = 5^4 + 2^4 \). So \( 641 | 2^{32} + 2^{28} \cdot 5^4 \). Also, \( 641 = 640 + 1 = 2^7 \cdot 5 + 1\). So \( 641 | (2^7 \cdot 5)^4 - 1 = 2^{28}\cdot 5^4 - 1 \). Hence \( 641 | 2^{32} + 2^{28} \cdot 5^4 -(2^{28}\cdot 5^4 - 1) \). QED

2n+1 3n+1 squares then 5n+3 not prime

Problem: Prove that if \( 2n+1 \) and \( 3n+1 \) are both squares, then \( 5n+3 \) is not a prime. Solution: Proof by contradiction. Suppose that there is n such that 5n+3 is prime. Note that \( 4(2n+1) - (3n+1) = 5n+3 \). Let \( 2n+1 = p^2 \) and \( 3n+1 = q^2 \), where \( p, q > 0 \). We have \( (2p-q)(2p+q) = 5n+3 \). Since RHS is a prime, we must have \(2p - q = 1 \) and \( 2p + q = 5n+3 \). Solving for \( q \) we get \( 2q = 5n + 2 \). Substituting, we get \( 2q = q^2 + 2n + 1 \), or \( -2n = (q-1)^2 \). Since RHS is \( \geq 0 \), we can only have equality when \( n= 0 \) and \( q = 1 \). In this case, we have \( 5n + 3 = 8 \) not a prime. QED.